Flash Bus Tour 2011 and Team “That Guy”

Mar
14
2011
Tags:


Warning: This post is geared towards fellow photographer lighting nerds.

Oh photography conferences. The speakers always show off their skills with their fancy $2,000 lenses or a $5,000-8,000 camera that makes you have gear lust. The first conference I went to had all these photographers use 1Ds Mark IIIs and 70-200mm f/2.8Ls for their portrait photography to get that bokeh. I went out and bought the Nikon version, but then after using one for a while, I thought to myself, “this thing is too darn heavy to carry everyday with me, and still really heavy to bring on shoots.” So most of the time it just sits at home, lonely and unused.

My friend Steve and I have a term for buying too much stuff: Team That Guy. “That guy” as in the dude that has way too much gear and doesn’t even use half of it. That guy who has tons of pro level gear with amateur results to show for it. That guy who constantly buys stuff to compensate for lack of skill. That guy who brings more gear to a shoot than he knows what to do with, and still comes back with really bad photos. That guy who does endless pixel peeping tests on his gear to make sure everything is perfect and only has photos of cats or brick walls to show for it. Yeah, we’ve all been there. The mindset of “if I had this piece of gear, I can totally do what David Hobby or Joe McNally does!” When we finally buy that piece of kit, we end up forgetting about everything else in our camera bag.

This is Team “That Guy” (Team TG for short), and it happens quite often.

This year’s Flash Bus Tour brings out Team TG in a different area – lighting. The famed Strobist (aka David Hobby) and Joe McNally are both huge users of small flash photography. They use these flashes to make the subject pop and manipulate light in a very interesting way. The downside for someone like me (that only owns one small hotshoe flash) is that these guys have and use a lot of them. It makes my camera bag jealous and want to buy more to match them.

The advantage to small hotshoe flashes is that they’re small and portable, but the downside is they don’t produce as much power as studio strobes. To fix that, you simply move into shade or darker environments where your flashes can overpower the ambient light. I have a studio strobe but that’s normally too big/heavy/cumbersome to bring on shoots alone. If I do decide to use it, I’d need an assistant or two to help me setup, tear down, and move from location to location otherwise it’s really slow. But now learning that these guys can take up to 30 minutes to take just a few photos at one location, I think I’m going to start trying that out. A few stellar quality photos is better than a hundred ok ones right?

Then we have modifiers. The shear amount of lightstands, boom arms, and light modifiers these guys have probably cost more than the flashes themselves; but they are very necessary in defining the shape and quality of your light. They went through each of the tools in their tool bag and did live demos on how they solve problems with making their photos. This was very enlightening – but also very gear lust inducing.

It’s very hard to avoid being “that guy” after watching their demo of how they work.

I have to hand it to them though, seeing their process and problem solving was very informational, and will definitely help me in creating better pictures. If the Flash Bus is coming to your city and it’s not sold out yet, I’d highly encourage you to go. David Hobby and Joe McNally are probably the photography industry’s best resource in terms of hot shoe lighting, and they are great instructors to boot. They were both funny, charismatic, and very generous with their knowledge.

Joe McNally and David Hobby

If you guys ever read my little blog, David and Joe: THANK YOU, and you guys are welcome back to Portland anytime. :)

One Light Portraits

Mar
13
2011

After Murder Mystery Night, I’ve been hooked on creating more studio-like environments and augmenting ambient light with a strong main light. Luckily I have many volunteers to be my subjects, so it provided more opportunities to practice. Especially with the 2011 Flash Bus Tour going on, I felt like it was a great time to post this. I did attend the Flash Bus Tour today, but I will save that for my next post.

All of these portraits were made with a Panasonic GF-1 which is now replaced by the GF2 which is actually smaller and lighter. I used PocketWizard Transceivers to trigger my Nikon SB-800 flash (which is now replaced by the Nikon SB-900). So you see, old technology still works! Honestly though, you can make these pictures with any old camera with a hot shoe and some manual controls. Everything here was done on manual. I had the speedlight on a lightstand with a small soft box up high angled down. First, I exposed for the ambient, and underexposed it by about 2-3 stops. Then I dialed in the power in my flash until the subject was lit to the correct exposure. This turns the white wall into more of a greyish color, which makes it look kind of like a fashion catalog type shot. Changing the white balance to a cooler temperature changes the color of the background and gives the overall picture a more stylized look. Of course, I couldn’t resist have just a little fun with it, so I gave them the choice of putting on some fake mustaches :)

Back in Time with Hasselblad

Mar
07
2011

Back in December my good friend Steve and I were admiring the beauty that is Hasselblad. A beautiful all mechanical film camera that shoots bigger negatives than 35mm. At almost four times the surface area and Carl Zeiss optics, it’s a guaranteed knock out in terms of image quality. Looking through the viewfinder, everything has a 3D look to it. Just by holding it in your hands, you know it’s something special, and it’s a classic camera that will stand the test of time.

I’ve only had the thing for 2 or so months, but it has already replaced my beloved Nikon D700 in my everyday camera bag. Even though the image quality of scanned film is not even close to the D700, it is still my preferred camera, flaws and all. I am ridiculously slow and meticulous, adjusting little settings and trying to get the focus nailed down, but it is so much fun. The new digital SLR bodies technology kind of takes the fun out of traditional photography. Your focus and exposure is wrapped up in half-press and full press, you can shoot bursts of 3-8 frames per second so you can shoot multiple compositions of the same picture very fast. You’ll get the job done in a matter of seconds, but what’s the fun in that?

The viewfinder in the Hasselblad is a waist level finder. You have to look down to see what you’re shooting. The really fun part is, left and right are backwards! It’s an uncorrected mirrored image you see because it doesn’t have a prism to correct it. Trying to move the frame to the left means you have to move the camera to the right, a lot of fun! Larger 4×5 and 8×10 view cameras are even more fun, the image is upside down! I don’t know why, but I like how it really slows you down because you have to think hard on composition. I also like that film is expensive to shoot – the cost of film, development, and 4×4 prints costs about $12, or $1 per shot. Can you imagine handing someone $1 every time you take a shot? It gets expensive fast, so each frame takes super long to shoot!

The images it produces are wonderful though, something that you can’t reproduce with a 35mm format camera. The Carl Zeiss optics combined with the large film surface area gives it a very unique look. The bokeh has a certain signature to it, and the overall grain structure and color of film gives it a lot of character. I’m still experimenting with different types of film, and I will likely shoot Kodak T-Max, Tri-X, and Portra exclusively. I have a pack of Velvia but the exposure is so hard to get right, and developing is expensive! Apparently not many labs do E-6 anymore.

Here are a few pictures that I shot and scanned recently:


Penny looking cute!


Good friends Barry and Meredith


The famed Portland sign in downtown.


The top of Multnomah Falls, still trying to get a hang of black and white!

Do you see the difference in image quality between film and digital? The one thing I’ve noticed is the transition of colors is a lot more natural with film. When digital sensors get blown out with white, it usually has a really ugly transition to pure white where one of the red, green, blue channels aren’t even. It may not matter in black and white as much, but it is pretty noticeable in color.

If you would like to have your portraits taken with medium format film before Kodak stops producing them in the next 2 years or so, let me know :)